<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ETF Flows Show Mixed Signals Despite High Volume]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/forum/assets/uploads/files/1775273146950-b9cf901b-7743-40c2-9d03-dc719baa80fb-image.png" alt="b9cf901b-7743-40c2-9d03-dc719baa80fb-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">While BlackRock’s IBIT has seen strong trading activity, overall spot Bitcoin ETF flows have been uneven. The sector recorded net outflows during much of Q1 2026, influenced by market volatility and broader macroeconomic conditions.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, flows turned positive in March, with funds adding over $1 billion after earlier withdrawals. This contrast highlights that high trading volume does not necessarily indicate new capital inflows, as activity can also reflect portfolio adjustments and short-term positioning.</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/topic/17923/etf-flows-show-mixed-signals-despite-high-volume</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 04:20:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://undeads.com/forum/topic/17923.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:25:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ETF Flows Show Mixed Signals Despite High Volume on Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:12:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">love how blacklisting happens right after the money is already gone</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/post/48124</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://undeads.com/forum/post/48124</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[encrypted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:12:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>